info@universallab.org
WhatsApp: +41762172997
logo-header
​
logo
Material Testing
Mechanical Testing
Tensile TestFibre Tensile TestHardness TestImpact TestFatigue TestOthers
Thermal Testing
Thermomechanical AnalysisDSCTGATGA (TG-DSC, TG-DTA)
Surface, Coating and Corrosion
Adhesion TestScratch TestCorrosion Cycle Test
Physical Properties
Functional propertiesPorosityDensity
Elemental & Chemical Composition
Compositional analysisElemental analysis
Microscopic Characterization
Particle analysisMicroscopy
Product Testing
Food & Agriculture Testing
Consumer Goods Testing
Electronics & Electrical Testing
Medical & Pharmaceutical Testing
Automotive & Transportation Testing
Packaging & Materials Testing
Chemical & Hazardous Substances Testing
Semiconductor Testing
Battery Testing
Petrochemical Testing
Environmental Test
Water Testing
Drinking Water Analysis
Soil & Sediment Testing
Soil Chemistry (pH, Nutrients)
Air Testing
Particulate Matter (PM2.5, PM10)
Noise & Acoustic Testing
Industrial/Occupational Noise
Waste & Sludge Testing
Hazardous Waste Classification
Instrumental Test
Spectroscopy
Emission
XRFXPSICP-OESGD-OES
Absorption
FTIRUV/VIS/NIRAAS
Mass Spectrometry
SIMSICP-MS
Other
RamanNMR
Microscopy
Electron
SEMTEMEBSDEMPA
Other
AFMFIB
Mechanical
Volumetric
Tensile TestFibre Tensile TestImpact TestFatigue Test
Surface
HardnessNanoindentationScratch
Others
Thermal Analysis
TGADSC
Physical Analysis
BETLaser diffractionDensityContact AngleZeta potential
Chromatography
GCHPLCIC
Services
  • Applications
  • Techniques
  • Standards
  • Industries
Regulatory testing
  • PFAS
  • REACH
  • VOC
Environmental testing
  • Water
  • Gas
Data analysis
  • XRD
  • XPS
  • FTIR
  • Raman
  • NMR
  • CT
  • SIMS
  • TGA
Blog
  • Knowledge
  • News
  • Policy
  • About us
    Contact

    Sample Requirements

    Application Case

    Example Result

    What our customers are saying

    Need precise analysis? Contact us – we'll help you choose the best solution for your needs.

    info@universallab.org+41 762172997
    Lab technician holding a blue flask

    Frequently Asked Questions

    HomeCategoryCart
    logo-footer-shop1

    European material analytical and measuring service provider dedicated for academic and industrial research

    About Us
    CareersTerms & ConditionsPrivacy Policy
    Customer Services
    Help CenterBecome a partnerReturns & Refunds
    Contact Us

    Parkstrasse 1, 5234 Villigen, Switzerland

    Email: info@universallab.org

    Phone: +41 762172997

    VAT: CHE-265.266.739 MWST

    © 2026 By Universallab. All rights reserved.

    This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
    product
    product-0
    product-1

    XRF (X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry)

    Variant (SKU)
    with grinding
    without grinding
    Liquid samples

    Price may vary based on selected options

    Delivery time: 1 ~ 2 weeks

    Introduction

    Introduction

    Introduction

    XRF (X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry) is a non-destructive technique for identifying and quantifying elemental composition.
    It is widely used across industries for its speed, versatility, and minimal sample preparation.

    • Non-destructive — Preserves the sample during testing
    • Multi-elemental Detection — Simultaneous analysis of a wide range of elements
    • Minimal Preparation — Often no digestion or chemical treatment required
    • Flexible Formats — Suitable for solids, powders, liquids, films, and coatings

    XRF plays a critical role in quality control, material verification, environmental testing, and regulatory compliance.

    Principle

    Principle

    Principle

    XRF works by irradiating a sample with primary X-rays, which excite the atoms in the material, causing them to emit secondary (fluorescent) X-rays. The energy and intensity of these emitted X-rays are characteristic of the elements present and their concentrations.

    1. A high-energy X-ray source irradiates the sample.
    2. Atoms in the sample are excited and emit element-specific fluorescent X-rays.
    3. A detector measures the energy and intensity of the emitted X-rays.
    4. The spectrum is analyzed to identify and quantify the elements present.
    Principle

    Principle

    No, XRF is not sensitive to elements lighter than sodium (Na). For light element analysis, other techniques such as combustion analysis or CHN analyzers are needed.

    Not always. Bulk solids and smooth surfaces can often be measured directly. Powders and liquids may require pressing or containment.

    Yes. Handheld XRF analyzers are widely used for on-site material screening and elemental analysis.

    ICP methods generally offer higher accuracy and lower detection limits, but require more complex sample preparation.

    Most XRF tests take between 30 seconds and 3 minutes per sample.

    Principle

    Principle

    Applicable Material&Industries Types:

    • Metals and Alloys: stainless steel, brass, aluminum alloys
    • Mining and Geology: ores, minerals, soils, sediments
    • Construction Materials: cement, glass, ceramics
    • Polymers and Plastics: additives, fillers, heavy metals
    • Environmental Samples: dust, soil, waste, sludge
    • Coatings and Films: plating thickness, uniformity, composition

    Comparison: EDXRF vs. WDXRF

    XRF instruments are generally categorized into two main types: EDXRF (Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence) and WDXRF (Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence). While both techniques are based on the same principle of X-ray-induced fluorescence, they differ significantly in detection method, performance, and application suitability.

    • EDXRF uses a solid-state detector to measure the energy of fluorescent X-rays directly. It is typically faster, more compact, and well-suited for general-purpose analysis, including fieldwork and quick screening of materials. However, its spectral resolution and accuracy—especially for light elements—are more limited.

    • WDXRF, in contrast, disperses the emitted X-rays through crystals to measure their wavelength with high precision. This results in better spectral resolution, lower detection limits, and greater quantitative accuracy, particularly for light and trace elements. WDXRF systems are generally larger, more expensive, and used in applications demanding high analytical performance such as in the cement, metallurgy, and petrochemical industries.

    In summary, EDXRF is preferred for speed and flexibility, while WDXRF is ideal for high-precision quantitative analysis where detection limits and elemental resolution are critical.

    When to choose:

    • Use EDXRF for general screening, handheld or portable analysis, or when budget and speed matter more than ultra-precision.
    • Choose WDXRF when you need high-resolution, trace-level accuracy, or are dealing with complex matrices (e.g., in cement, steel, petrochemical industries).

    Example Results

    Example XRF results table

    ElementConcentration (%)Detection Limit (%)
    Fe0.7450.005
    Zn0.0920.003
    Pb0.0140.001
    Ti0.1120.004
    Ca5.2350.010

    Pros and Cons

    Comparison of Elemental Analysis Methods (Method as Columns)

    AttributeXRFICP-OESICP-MSAAS (Flame/Furnace)Wet Chemistry (Titration)
    Working PrincipleX-ray induced fluorescenceOptical emission from excited atoms in plasmaMass detection of ions in plasmaLight absorption by ground-state atomsStoichiometric chemical reactions
    Elements Detected~40 (Na to U)≥70 (metals and non-metals)≥75Limited (~30)Limited
    Detection Limitsppmsub-ppb to ppmppt to ppbppm to ppb (graphite furnace)Variable
    Sample ThroughputHighHigh (multi-element)HighLow (single element)Low
    Matrix ToleranceVariableGood (with interference correction)High (with collision/reaction cells)ModerateLow
    Recommended UseSolid sample screening, bulk compositionRoutine trace analysis in complex matricesUltra-trace and speciation studiesLow-cost single-element analysisClassical wet-lab environments

    Advantages:

    • Non-destructive and fast
    • Requires minimal to no sample preparation
    • Suitable for solids, powders, and liquids
    • Portable options available for field use
    • Excellent for rapid screening and routine QC

    Limitations:

    • Not suitable for ultra-trace analysis (use ICP-MS for sub-ppb)
    • Less accurate for light elements (e.g., Na, Mg)
    • Surface homogeneity and sample matrix can affect results

    Sample Requirements (Detailed)

    Accurate and reliable XRF analysis requires attention to sample presentation. While XRF is known for its minimal preparation requirements, optimizing certain parameters can significantly enhance measurement quality and reproducibility.


    Acceptable Physical Forms

    Sample TypeAcceptable?Notes
    Bulk solids✔Best results with flat, homogeneous surfaces
    Powders✔Pressed into pellets or analyzed in sample cups
    Liquids✔Analyzed in film-covered liquid sample cells
    Films/Coatings✔Require smooth substrate and known layer structure
    Irregular solids⚠Possible with calibration corrections; affects reproducibility
    Gels/Suspensions⚠Should be dried or stabilized before measurement

    Sample Size & Geometry

    • Minimum Amount:

      • Solids: ~1–5 grams, depending on instrument aperture
      • Powders: Enough to fill a 32 mm diameter cup or press into a 20–40 mm pellet
      • Liquids: At least 3–5 mL for filling standard sample holders
    • Thickness:

      • Should exceed the “infinite thickness” for major elements (~1–5 mm depending on density and matrix)
      • Thin coatings require calibration standards or specialized analysis modes
    • Shape:

      • Flat and homogeneous surfaces give the most accurate results
      • Curved or irregular samples may result in poor reproducibility

    Surface Condition

    • Homogeneity: Inhomogeneous samples can cause elemental signal variation
    • Roughness: Smooth surfaces yield better analytical precision
    • Contamination: Clean surfaces are essential; avoid dust, oils, or residues
    • Moisture: Dry samples preferred; water can interfere with X-ray absorption and fluorescence

    Sample Preparation Guidelines

    Sample TypePreparation Recommendations

    Test Procedure

    1. Sample Preparation: Minimal; may require grinding, pressing, or drying
    2. Sample Introduction: Placed in sample holder or directly measured (handheld)
    3. Irradiation: X-ray tube generates excitation beam
    4. Detection: Emitted X-rays collected and analyzed
    5. Data Interpretation: Elemental concentration derived via calibration or standardless analysis Modern XRF systems provide rapid, reproducible results with user-friendly software interfaces.

    Comparison: EDXRF vs. WDXRF

    XRF instruments are generally categorized into two main types: EDXRF (Energy Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence) and WDXRF (Wavelength Dispersive X-ray Fluorescence). While both techniques are based on the same principle of X-ray-induced fluorescence, they differ significantly in detection method, performance, and application suitability.

    • EDXRF uses a solid-state detector to measure the energy of fluorescent X-rays directly. It is typically faster, more compact, and well-suited for general-purpose analysis, including fieldwork and quick screening of materials. However, its spectral resolution and accuracy—especially for light elements—are more limited.

    • WDXRF, in contrast, disperses the emitted X-rays through crystals to measure their wavelength with high precision. This results in better spectral resolution, lower detection limits, and greater quantitative accuracy, particularly for light and trace elements. WDXRF systems are generally larger, more expensive, and used in applications demanding high analytical performance such as in the cement, metallurgy, and petrochemical industries.

    • When to choose:

    • Use EDXRF for general screening, handheld/portable analysis, or when budget and speed matter more than ultra-precision.

    • Choose WDXRF when you need high-resolution, trace-level accuracy, or are dealing with complex matrices (e.g., in cement, steel, petrochemical industries).

    Pros and Cons

    Comparison of Elemental Analysis Methods (Method as Columns)

    AttributeXRFICP-OESICP-MSAAS (Flame/Furnace)Wet Chemistry (Titration)
    Working PrincipleX-ray induced fluorescenceOptical emission from excited atoms in plasmaMass detection of ions in plasmaLight absorption by ground-state atomsStoichiometric chemical reactions
    Elements Detected~40 (Na to U)≥70 (metals and non-metals)≥75Limited (~30)Limited
    Detection Limitsppmsub-ppb to ppmppt to ppbppm to ppb (graphite furnace)Variable
    Sample ThroughputHighHigh (multi-element)HighLow (single element)Low
    Matrix ToleranceVariableGood (with interference correction)High (with collision or reaction cells)ModerateLow
    Recommended UseSolid sample screening, bulk compositionRoutine trace analysis in complex matricesUltra-trace and speciation studiesLow-cost single-element analysisClassical wet-lab environments

    ✅ Key Advantages of XRF

    • Non-destructive and rapid — Ideal for routine QC
    • Minimal to no sample prep — No acids or digestion
    • Suitable for a wide range of sample types
    • Field-portable instruments available
    • Cost-effective for high-throughput elemental screening

    ⚠ Limitations to Consider

    • Not ideal for ultra-trace detection (prefer ICP-MS for sub-ppb)
    • Reduced accuracy for light elements (Na, Mg, etc.)
    • Sensitive to surface roughness and matrix effects
    • Semi-quantitative results in some cases

    Note: For precise quantification or elements like C, N, O, consider complementary techniques such as CHNS elemental analyzers or ICP-OES.

    XRF is a rapid, reliable, and cost-effective elemental analysis tool, ideal for solid and bulk material analysis across industries. Its minimal sample preparation and non-destructive nature make it an excellent choice for routine quality control and material verification.

  • XRF analysis is a semi-quantitative method and should be used only as a reference for estimating elemental composition. Due to inherent limitations of the technique—particularly its reduced stability and accuracy in detecting light elements such as carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, and fluorine—it is not recommended for applications requiring high analytical precision. For more accurate quantification, alternative analytical methods are advised.
  • Bulk Solids
    Wipe clean; polish if necessary for coatings/thin films
    PowdersGrind to uniform particle size (≤75 µm), dry if needed, press into stable pellets with binder
    LiquidsPour into clean XRF cups sealed with Mylar or Prolene film; avoid air bubbles
    FilmsMount on flat substrate with known thickness and composition

    Sample Containers and Holders

    • Solids: Use instrument-specific sample trays or cups
    • Powders: Disposable plastic or aluminum cups with XRF film
    • Liquids: Leak-proof XRF cells with robust window films (e.g., 4 µm Mylar)
    • Precautions:
      • Avoid using metallic tools or holders that may contribute to background signal
      • Ensure no cross-contamination between samples during preparation

    Storage & Transportation

    • Store samples in clean, dry, labeled containers
    • Avoid high humidity or temperature extremes
    • Use anti-static packaging for powders
    • Transport in cushioned, secure boxes to prevent physical disruption

    XRF (X-ray Fluorescence Spectrometry) is a non-destructive analytical technique used to determine the elemental composition of materials. It is widely appreciated for its speed, simplicity, and ability to analyze solids, liquids, and powders with minimal sample preparation.